Results 1 to 20 of 77

Thread: Hey Jerome, you socialist faggot.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Reality kthx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,234

    Hey Jerome, you socialist faggot.

    Just wanted to ask you if you started making more from the tax cuts yet?

    Also isn't that faggot cuck leader from Canada the absolute worst? I mean I know you hate Trump but could you imagine having that faggot as your PM or president?

    Also how was your weekend man?
    Rabble Rabble Rabble


  2. #2
    is on druggs Jerome Scuggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    loUiSiAna
    Posts
    13,024
    i remember when april 15th was the tax deadline and idk why people have been filing earlier and earlier but i'll be damned if i even give a shit before april 10th

    though idk if i even have to pay taxes for 2017, i spent most of the year living off stock dividends so i could do that capitalist thing where i say i "worked hard" for my money while doing no work and cashing out every month. lucky me went hard in the fedex employee stock purchase program over a 5-year time period where fedex stock went from like 80 bucks to over 200 so that worked out super fuckin well

    justin trudeau is trash and no amount of idpol pandering will change that & the Left has hated this guy for quite some time, so welcome to the party https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...isaster-planet

    it's mardi gras season here so you know how the weekends be
    The Phase > what version of ssc are you guys running?
    Criminal> idk whatever was on the first google result for "piece of shit spaceship game from 96 free download"


    Quote Originally Posted by Leland View Post
    lol lo l oo lo l ol olol o lo l ol o lo l o


    420 420 420

    123

  3. #3
    is on druggs Jerome Scuggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    loUiSiAna
    Posts
    13,024
    Quote Originally Posted by qan View Post
    Yeah, I knew someone whose personal pronoun was "D". It was quite annoying, but this was while much of this was still new and people just sort of went with it. Was awkward, to say the least.

    The law that Peterson's talking about he's claiming would make using the wrong pronoun a crime. Whether or not that's actually correct is not something I have the ability to judge. It's what he believes is happening, and that's why he opposes it.

    To say the far left or far right are inherently authoritarian doesn't make any sense, agreed. Or that identity politics are limited to any particular group, ideology or way of thinking.

    One thing that has distanced me from identifying with leftist politics in recent years is the increasingly authoritarian bent of some of those who claim to be left-leaning (but are often just following identity politics on social issues and are usually fairly right-wing in terms of economic issues) -- what I guess you could refer to the mainstream left. The people who watch Colbert, guffaw at every Trump joke and are quick to post how disgusted they are whenever anyone says anything that's a bit out of line with respectable society. The people who always vote for the Democrats, often as a vote against Republicans.

    The alternative to that crowd seems to be the hyper-ideological left. They're happy to argue, but mostly just in the context of which branch of Communism you think will cause the workers of the world to unite. Most love tight rhetoric and violent revolution with no plans for who does the dishes afterward.

    I don't really see a takeover from either the right or left authoritarians, but I do see more polarization. And it feels as if antiauthoritarianism is becoming a sort of social faux pas. If you're not willing to regulate speech or condemn the other side as subhuman scum, you're a traitor. Talking with the "enemy" or considering that they could have a point is heretical. This doesn't mean you have to identify with a particular set of beliefs, but at the very least, you can't say anything that might be construed as something "those guys" would believe. Maybe negative belief, what Nietzsche called slave morality, bound together not so much by what you believe is good as what you hate.
    the reason i cant buy peterson's larger points is because he really goes lengths to talk shit about alot of postmodern authors i've read and enjoyed, and in doing so i think he shows just how much he fails to understand the concepts these pomo fucks were pushing

    like in the example you've shown, i think you sort of show why the concern is illusory: you knew someone who did it while "this was new" and to that extent noone can argue that yeah, individuals gonna be individuals and you're gonna see stuff like that. but at the same time i also think it's obvious that this is not what the more recent and more public trans acceptance movement has been about. and this sort of strikes at the core of one of my problems with peterson: he really wants to prove some sort of "cultural marxism" is out there ruining society but he continues to use examples that aren't really indicative of more overall, widespread trends.

    i cant even begin to explain how deep and truly insightful the left's views on authoritarianism are... because the Left's entire existence is predicated on a rejection of authoritarianism, if you trace the idea of "leftism" through its etymological roots. conversely, the right wing embraces authoritarianism basically any time it aligns with their personal views. this is why the anti-immigrant Right has let ICE become a terrifyingly fascist group within America, not to mention the same folks allowing the NSA to tap into basically everything in the wake of post-9/11 hysteria. edit: and it sort of forces me to take extreme views on the opposite side because, for example, people are 100% okay with letting ICE just shit on the constitution because those people have a problem with immigrants, and in my frustration and love of sarcasm i shitpost stuff like "erase all borders and let 'em all come here" which leads us to the problem i mention in my edit below. but seriously though, i cant stress enough how ICE is very much literally and figuratively acting like a modern day Gestapo.

    but there's a very real paradox here, which is: revolutions are inherently authoritarian. they just are and no successful revolution was able to succeed without some very dubious application of centrally-mandated force. but that being said, i very much trust the people who are aware of this to handle it if and when the time comes, as opposed to modern right-wingers who can't think beyond terms like "big" or "small" government, who speak of revolutions and/or "refreshing the tree of liberty with blood" etc yet don't know even the simplest concepts about literal real-world revolution.

    edit 3: a very real-world example that i've witnessed in this regard is the Right-wing circlejerk over the 2nd amendment. guns guns guns guns guns will stop THE TYRANTS. meanwhile the Left considers the true point of the 2nd amendment to be a guarantee to organize an armed resistance. you can have all the guns in the world but if you can't form an organized, competent group to translate that firepower into successful resistance, it means nothing. This is why the Left is all about organizing and this is why the Right hates organizing, whether it be attempts to get rid of unions, or attempts to disrupt and mock protesting.

    (i should point out here that personally i do hope for a political/nonviolent change as opposed to revolution but i also am 100% fine embracing whatever method leads to what i consider the best path for society, which leads us to the paradox above)

    anyways to sort of tie these two thoughts together: yeah there are kooks on the left but i don't see these kooks who advocate arresting people for misgendering folks or whatever, gaining popular platforms or spawning significant movements. they're sensationalized by the media and by their ideological opponents and us on the left just sort of laugh+ignore them into irrelevance. however, when you look at the right, you see the radicals among them, the kooks, you see them gaining mainstream popularity, being elected to positions of power, getting prime time tv slots. and to me, i think it's obvious which one is, pragmatically, the bigger threat to the average american.

    e: oh yeah i should also mention that meme culture and irony poisoning have led to alot of problems with really trying to nail down any ideology's premises. my brother, pave, is like 100% into the whole MAGA hat wearing, build-the-wall yelling pro-trump thing but when you sit down and talk to him he really doesnt care about that shit and would even advocate for a single payer health system. Conversely there's alot of "tankies" who like, post about how stalin did nothing wrong and how the DPRK is glorious and perfect et cetera but really just want like, bernie sanders to be president or something

    that's a whole 'nother conversation that i think about fucking all the time because i wonder how modern historians are supposed to dig through gigaflops of internet posts and use them as evidence that people thought or said this or that at certain points in time. like how will future historians separate the truthfeels from the ironyposting, shit like that
    Last edited by Jerome Scuggs; 02-06-2018 at 09:20 PM.
    The Phase > what version of ssc are you guys running?
    Criminal> idk whatever was on the first google result for "piece of shit spaceship game from 96 free download"


    Quote Originally Posted by Leland View Post
    lol lo l oo lo l ol olol o lo l ol o lo l o


    420 420 420

    123

  4. #4
    Reality kthx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,234
    Figured it was about time for a new thread, don't want Eph's posts getting buried in this bullshit.
    Rabble Rabble Rabble


  5. #5
    is on druggs Jerome Scuggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    loUiSiAna
    Posts
    13,024
    Quote Originally Posted by kthx View Post
    Figured it was about time for a new thread, don't want Eph's posts getting buried in this bullshit.
    i suspected this is why you started this thread lol

    it was tearing me apart having to derail eph's thread, but the alternative was NOT replying to posts???? as if i would do that

    and i feel dumb as shit that the idea of just starting a new thread flew right by me
    The Phase > what version of ssc are you guys running?
    Criminal> idk whatever was on the first google result for "piece of shit spaceship game from 96 free download"


    Quote Originally Posted by Leland View Post
    lol lo l oo lo l ol olol o lo l ol o lo l o


    420 420 420

    123

  6. #6
    Reality kthx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,234
    Starting new threads is sorta my thing, I don't even feel like arguing tonight I am too tired and this coffee isn't really doing the trick. I mean I am arguing a little bit but with dipshits on reddit who all have the political and societal understanding ff your friend on the phone or someone like Jessup. Usually these actually require my full attention at the very least.
    Last edited by kthx; 02-06-2018 at 09:15 PM.
    Rabble Rabble Rabble


  7. #7
    Leland
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by kthx View Post
    Just wanted to ask you....... how was your weekend man?


    good
    u
    Leland

  8. #8
    Reality kthx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,234
    Rabble Rabble Rabble


  9. #9
    is on druggs Jerome Scuggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    loUiSiAna
    Posts
    13,024
    Quote Originally Posted by kthx View Post
    "The recoil bruised my shoulder, which can happen if you don't know what you're doing."

    only way to bruise yr shoulder w/ ar-15 is if you take a 12ga shotgun and write "AR-15" on the side and shoot it

    the lack of recoil is what made me think the ar-15 was a disturbingly creepy weapon, blowing holes in shit 50yds away shouldn't feel easier than plinking with a .22

    e: idk why i try to fight the idea that the left is like, afraid of guns or something. redneck revolt stays kicking ass at counterprotests cuz all the maga chuds assume they can fuck with people, and wind up getting their shit kicked in. if ppl ask tell them lefties dont even know what guns are
    Last edited by Jerome Scuggs; 02-07-2018 at 11:28 PM.
    The Phase > what version of ssc are you guys running?
    Criminal> idk whatever was on the first google result for "piece of shit spaceship game from 96 free download"


    Quote Originally Posted by Leland View Post
    lol lo l oo lo l ol olol o lo l ol o lo l o


    420 420 420

    123

  10. #10
    Reality kthx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,234
    I was just asking for a fucking laugh not a my socialist overloads can beat up your maga chuds rant, ffs.
    Rabble Rabble Rabble


  11. #11
    is on druggs Jerome Scuggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    loUiSiAna
    Posts
    13,024
    The Phase > what version of ssc are you guys running?
    Criminal> idk whatever was on the first google result for "piece of shit spaceship game from 96 free download"


    Quote Originally Posted by Leland View Post
    lol lo l oo lo l ol olol o lo l ol o lo l o


    420 420 420

    123

  12. #12
    give life, take death qan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    oly, wa
    Posts
    893
    Quote Originally Posted by Dierienow
    Information coming directly from Mueller's indictment states that the defendants (Russian Nationals and their orgs here) have been posing as American activists since 2014. They stole the identities of real Americans as well to add a layer of deception. They operated social media pages and "over time became the means to reach a significant number of Americans".
    I've heard "Russian national" used a lot in this situation. Very illustrative of the deceptive nature of these kinds of reports.

    The reason the term "Russian national" is used in this context is that it sounds simultaneously more insidious and more official, while literally still just meaning "Russian citizen". "Russian citizen" lacks the punch needed to get people coming back to the infofeed and buying your advertiser's products, though, so you've gotta ramp it up with "Russian national." As far as I'm aware, those charged have not been linked to any government agency. Same goes for the term "Russian hackers." The implication, again, is "Russian hackers employed by the Russian state." Yet there is little evidence of that -- as far as I'm aware. Some of the so-called "hacks" are ... heh ... portscans. Portscans initiated from an IP inside the Russian Federation. Right now, I could start a VPN, get a Russian IP, and portscan the DNC. (It's not even illegal to do.) Look, Ma! I'm a Russian hacker! She'd be so proud.

    The point is: Russian, Chinese, Israeli, American, French, German, Brazilian and Thai nationals are all posing as activitists in the US and elsewhere. This is not new information. Disinfo campaigns, whether financed by government agencies or NGOs, are a fact of life. The US also tries to actively influence Russian elections. The CIA is in loose, de facto control of many small governments by proxy. "Troll farms" exist and exert influence, and are probably a necessary component of any even moderately-sized political campaign in today's world. Does this mean "democracy is hacked!!!," and we will never be safe again? No. It means we've got to use our heads to analyze what we read and hear, form our own opinions, and not rely on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram for our news. (Or any small set of sources, for that matter, particularly not non-print sources that are ideologically-aligned and are designed to be difficult to process while triggering emotional responses, such as MSNBC, Fox News, Infowars, CNN, /pol/, NPR, Russia Today, Voice of America, etc.)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kthx
    I also have no problem with the re militarization of our country or for the religious like respect our military gets. I have no problem having military parades, or having flyovers at sporting events or any of that. I don't see why it bothers anyone to be honest.
    Because it's an advertisement for a product, the stated intent of which is to kill people. You'd have to be pretty naive about the workings of the world, or a sociopath, for that stuff not to bother you.
    "You're a gentleman," they used to say to him. "You shouldn't have gone murdering people with a hatchet; that's no occupation for a gentleman."
    -Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

  13. #13
    Registered User Tone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,660
    Jerome, its not good to be socialist, its bad, give freedom a chance, the libertarian way of life ends up helping more unfortunate people than socialism does. We have to be as ethical and correct as possible in our mentally ill world of sociopathic demons.

  14. #14
    Registered User Weak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    538
    Send nudes

  15. #15
    Tru Crip Rosstones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New York, Bitches
    Posts
    290
    Jerome loves the pnas.

    Tone, give me my name back you newb.

    ...rookie fucks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •